In an eventful weekend of Premier League football, controversial decisions involving the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) once again took center stage. A series of dramatic matches across England saw Nottingham Forest, Arsenal, Manchester United, and other teams embroiled in incidents that left fans and pundits debating the role of technology in modern football.
Nottingham Forest believed they had scored a fourth goal against their opponents in the 64th minute when Nikola Milenkovic headed home from a free-kick. However, their celebrations were cut short when VAR intervened to review the play. This decision mirrored past controversies, such as Newcastle's contentious goal against Arsenal last season, where the ball's position was not clear on the goal-line camera. In contrast, this time, the ball's trajectory was visible, making the VAR's task seemingly straightforward.
Meanwhile, at the Emirates Stadium, Arsenal thought they had clinched a dramatic victory over Aston Villa with an 87th-minute goal. Mikel Merino's shot deflected off Kai Havertz and into the back of the net. However, Villa's Boubacar Kamara appealed for handball, prompting a VAR review by John Brooks. Despite Arsenal's muted celebrations in anticipation of a potential VAR intervention, the goal was disallowed due to Havertz's unintentional handball. The ruling adhered to the attacking handball law, which prohibits goals scored with an arm or hand regardless of intent.
Elsewhere, Manchester United was awarded a penalty in the 20th minute against their rivals after Joshua Zirkzee was brought down inside the area by Carlos Baleba. The incident highlighted VAR's decisive role in awarding spot kicks, similar to a previous match where Brighton faced Aston Villa, and a penalty was advised by VAR for Pedro's challenge on Morgan Rogers.
In another match, Luis Díaz found himself at the heart of a VAR review after going down in the box while chasing a pass from Ryan Gravenberch. Although his subsequent shot was saved by goalkeeper Mark Flekken, Díaz's fall drew scrutiny. The VAR reviewed the footage and noted minimal contact between Díaz's right foot and Flekken's left arm. The decision to not award a penalty sparked debate on whether players exploit minimal contact to gain advantages.
The complexities of the handball law were further highlighted during a game where Sepp van den Berg attempted to cross into the penalty area only for the ball to strike Ibrahima Konaté's arm. Despite close proximity and Konaté's arm being by his side, the incident called into question the consistency of handball interpretations. The two-tier handball law continues to perplex fans, as defenders are often treated differently under similar circumstances.
Another intriguing VAR moment occurred when Southampton faced off against their opponents. Chris Wood appeared to be in an offside position but did not touch the ball. The referee had to determine if Wood's presence influenced Southampton defenders enough to constitute an offence.
Leave a Reply