The United Kingdom and the European Union are already negotiating a new Security and Defence Partnership. This significant advance might change the prospects for their joint cooperative ventures on security issues. This initiative aims to promote deeper collaboration on acute defense issues. It is indicative of the UK’s broader developing attitude to its relationship with European counterparts post-Brexit. The conversations are a sign key leaders are awakening to the power of collaborative security approaches in an increasingly volatile global landscape.
Negotiations around this partnership started back in 2020 under former Prime Minister Boris Johnson. At the time, Johnson was calling for less complacency and a more joined up approach to security challenges facing the continent of Europe. Fast forward to now, and the Labour government, led by Sir Keir Starmer, is advocating for an improved and ambitious relationship with the EU. Starmer’s administration envisions new and regular interactions with European leaders, seeking to redefine the UK’s role on the continent.
Lord Hayward has called for the plan to be scrapped over fears that it would pave the way for online voting. Even as negotiations loomed, he cautioned that such a deal would ensnare the state government in a “bear trap,” further mucking up the fragile political ecosystem. Even as those discussions continue to develop, it is extremely important that the federal government approach those negotiations strategically to prevent the pitfalls from arising.
Labour politician Sir Keir Starmer sounded a similar note when he called for a more pragmatic approach to politics. He stated, “serious pragmatism defeats performative politics.” This statement further emphasizes his government’s commitment to common-sense solutions over performative action. Critics, both in the Labour Party and beyond, are sounding alarms. They are terrified that any compromises perceived by ardent leave supporters might find them accused of betraying the cause.
Former Brexit secretary David Davis was instrumental in taking charge of the initial negotiations of the UK’s exit from the EU. He remains a powerful force and voice in this continuing discussion. In the meantime, Kaja Kallas—the EU’s foreign policy chief—is still in charge of these negotiations. Kallas has highlighted the urgency of this partnership by stating, “considering what is going on in the world […] we need to move forward with this partnership.”
On defense, both parties are working together to form a united front. They are working together in the Coalition of the Willing. SAFE programme, to provide up to €150 billion (£126 billion) in loans to support new projects. This important initiative is very much in play at the moment. Such funding could significantly strengthen defensive military support throughout Europe, showing a united interest in security and prosperity.
Unsurprisingly, her government is currently dancing hard after a ‘veterinary’ deal. Our deal is to remove all targeted border controls on food and drink commodities. This deal will make it easier, quicker and cheaper for UK and EU businesses to trade, helping exporters create jobs and driving down costs for consumers. Julianne Ponan owns the company that sells vegan snack bars to 18 countries. As she noticed, it is still a minor percentage of her gear which eventually makes it to the EU market. These deals have the potential to greatly expand UK businesses’ access to new trade opportunities.
Shadow International Trade Secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds has stated that reducing the cost of food and drink is one of the principal aims set out in Labour’s manifesto. He argues that reducing trade barriers would do more than help businesses — it would help consumers who are already experiencing rising prices. Philip Thomas-Symonds underlining the need for practical out-of-the-box solutions to spur economic growth.
Additionally, discussions have emerged around a youth mobility deal that could allow individuals under 30 years of age from both the UK and EU to live and work in each other’s countries. This initiative has garnered support from various sectors, with Thomas-Symonds stating that “a smart, controlled youth mobility scheme would of course have benefits for our young people.” Such measures can go a long way to bolstering cultural understanding and economic partnership between the new-generation citizens of both areas.
Not all voices are on board with this move towards greater cooperation with the EU. Richard Tice, indeed, has cast doubt on abandoning NATO as the bedrock of UK defence policy. As he remarked at the time, “We don’t want to be hampered by some knuckleheaded top-down bureaucratic military system. Our defence is guaranteed by NATO.” Tice’s sentiments are indicative of the broader fears among portions of the right that deeper involvement in EU military initiatives would erode national sovereignty.
Calum Miller made a great point about how people would perceive the UK’s level of cooperative effort with European counterparts. He asked, “When we are comfortable having those relationships, why are we so averse to having it with our nearest neighbours?” This question points to a key tension in the debate over the UK’s post-Brexit international strategy.
As negotiations continue, David Henig, a former senior UK trade negotiator, has been offering Shapiro tactical advice to steer them through these complicated discussions. His expertise will be essential in addressing concerns from various stakeholders while striving to achieve a partnership that serves both UK and EU interests.
Leave a Reply