The recent developments surrounding Ahmed al-Sharaa, a controversial figure in Syrian politics, have raised significant questions about U.S. foreign policy and the future of Syria. In December of this last year, the Biden administration declared that it will withdraw the $10 million bounty on Sharaa’s arrest. This decision drew unusual bipartisan outrage from political leaders at every level of government. Sharaa was recently designated a “specially designated global terrorist” by the U.S. He’s proven to be a fierce advocate on behalf of Syria and recently captured the world’s attention after his meeting with former President Donald Trump.
Sharaa is notably associated with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a Sunni Islamist group that has become increasingly influential in the region. His recent comments attest to his thinking that the Trump administration’s sanctions relief has done wonders for Syria. He believes that this decision has created an opportunity for the country to move towards stability and economic recovery. At a summit of Gulf leaders in Saudi Arabia last week, Trump praised Sharaa as a “young, attractive guy” and a “tough guy.” His remarks further complicated the story of how the U.S. relates to people on the list of those designated as terrorists.
“I think he’s got a real shot at pulling it together,” Trump stated, expressing cautious optimism about Sharaa’s potential role in stabilizing Syria.
Despite this apparent goodwill from some U.S. leaders, others remain skeptical about the implications of engaging with Sharaa and his administration. Senator Marco Rubio highlighted concerns about the transitional authority figures in Syria, stating that they “didn’t pass their background check with the FBI.” He emphasized the precarious nature of their leadership, warning that they could be “weeks, not many months, away from potential collapse and a full-scale civil war of epic proportions.”
Rubio emphasized the complex and dangerous dynamics at play in Syria. He stressed that there is a “deep distrust” of each other between internal factions, a condition further complicated by President Bashar al-Assad’s rule of divide and conquer. He pointed to the willingness of countries in the region to help send support into Syria. As they’ve written about, they are struggling with concerns over U.S. sanctions.
The good news was that … if we hadn’t included them, it was sure to fail, Rubio specifically highlighted the dangers of reengaging with Sharaa’s government. He cautioned that not doing this engagement would lead to a much worse instability.
“We want to help the Syrian people rebuild a new, inclusive and peaceful Syria,” she stated, highlighting a desire for international collaboration in support of Syrian citizens.
Today, Sharaa’s administration has turned heads in a number of countries, all eager to provide technical assistance. These nations back off because they fear the secondary effects of U.S. sanctions. Geopolitical views are preventing humanitarian access. As a consequence, millions of Syrians are now in urgent need of assistance.
Leave a Reply