The ongoing debate over artificial intelligence and copyright protection took a dramatic turn as the House of Lords voted to amend the Data (Use and Access) Bill, seeking to impose transparency requirements on AI companies. The amendment ultimately won with a broad, bipartisan majority of 147 votes. Yet the administration has already shot down similar proposals that would have AI companies disclose the materials they’re using to train their programs. Paul McCartney, Elton John, Billie Eilish, and other top artists in the music community are expressing outrage. Topping the list are Sir Elton John and Sir Paul McCartney.
Sir Elton John, speaking alongside playwright James Graham in an interview with Laura Kuenssberg for the BBC, expressed his discontent with the government’s approach. He criticized the decision to exempt tech companies from copyright laws. He cautioned that this step jeopardizes the rights of all artists, particularly younger ones who might not be able to mount a defense against deep-pocketed tech corporations.
“I’m very angry about it, just being absolute losers,” – Sir Elton John
The situation escalated further as Sir Elton John warned that the government was on a path to “rob young people of their legacy and their income.” His remarks convey an increasing concern. Craig is concerned that absent the right protections, the generations to come will find their creative labor hijacked without just reward.
Sir Paul McCartney previously voiced similar apprehensions, indicating that the rise of AI could lead to a “Wild West” environment where artists’ copyrights remain unprotected. He, along with Sir Elton John and other artists, signed a letter expressing their deep concerns about how AI could impact their work and livelihood.
The government maintains a different stance. A spokesperson emphasized the need for collaboration between the UK’s creative industries and AI firms, indicating that they are exploring a package of measures designed to benefit both sectors.
“It is equally important that we put in the groundwork now as we consider the next steps,” – Government spokesperson
Regardless of these pledges and promises, backlash from the private sector is growing. Tom Kiehl, chief executive of UK Music, said he was alarmed. He warned that the government is “on the cusp” of giving up on the country’s music ecosystem simply to win favor with American tech companies. He warned that if ministers proceed with plans allowing AI companies to utilize artists’ content without compensation, it would amount to “committing theft, thievery on a high scale.”
The House of Commons last week voted down all amendments to the bill. Consequently, the bill will keep ping-ponging between the two Houses until they can work out an agreement. This AI-copyright tug-of-war sheds light on the polarized state of AI and copyright conversations today.
Against this incendiary backdrop, Sir Elton John today released his blistering reproof of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In a wide-ranging address he took aim at Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, pulling no punches. He called on Starmer to “wise up” at the same time as calling Kyle “a little bit of a moron.” You can feel the anger of artists in these comments. They know that their rights are being ignored with each incremental advancement in technology.
As these conversations unfold, the issue remains clear: ensuring that copyright holders retain control over their work is paramount. Without appropriate measures in place, artists fear losing their ability to protect their creations from unregulated use by AI technology.
Leave a Reply