The grocery store aisles are filled with vibrant packaging and enticing claims that can easily mislead even the most diligent shoppers. Recent developments show that food companies are moving towards a different kind of label. Specifically, they are using a front-of-package label—Facts Up Front—that was made by industry trade groups. This effort, though well-intentioned to make nutritional information more straightforward and easily digestible, leads to several worries about the initiative’s effectiveness in steering consumer purchases.
The Facts Up Front label is a treasure trove of nutrition-speak. It provides a focus on three nutrients, which food manufacturers advise consumers to avoid. The percentage values shown on these labels are based on a typical 2,000-calorie diet. Few Americans adhere to this caloric limit. Consequently, these figures may not truly represent the dietary requirements of each individual. Millions of shoppers may be deceived by tempting assertions. These claims may actually be counterproductive to their individuals’ personal health aspirations.
Understanding Nutritional Claims
Food labels often employ terminology such as “free,” “high,” “low,” “more,” “good source of,” and “reduced” to describe specific nutrients. Health, nutrient and structure/function claims While these terms may offer you helpful insight, only three types of claims are highly regulated by the FDA. Health claims, which link a particular food or nutrient to a specific disease or health related condition, are particularly scrutinized. Yet a host of other claims are still left completely unreined, leaving consumers in a confused and misled state.
Brands are already putting millions of dollars into figuring out what buzzwords align with the latest dietary fads. This trend is especially sinister in an industry where food sold for retail sale is a trillion dollar market. In 2022, Americans spent over $1.7 billion on the specific food items listed in our legislation. This shows how crucial successful labeling strategies can be on the economy.
“You should be skeptical of any kind of claim you see on food packaging,” – Christina Roberto
A new study focused on around labeling practices found on fruit drinks purchased by parents of young kids. What the researchers found was a pretty remarkable stat. In fact, over 97% of the more than 2,000 beverages displayed at least one nutrition-related health claim directly on their container. Sadly, less than 10% of the articles that denied corporate funding were protective of industry interests. This reveals a deep, systemic bias in favor of pushing these goods.
The Reality Behind Popular Products
It is increasingly common that popular drinks marketed to children come loaded with confusing and deceptive health claims. Nutrition expert Anna Grummon refers to these types of beverages as “basically just sugar water.” She cautions that they are frequently promoted under claims laden with terms that mislead customers, as per recent study.
“From a nutrition point of view, we don’t need these drinks,” – Anna Grummon
Even though they’re chock-full of sugar, these products get away with deceptive labels that suggest they’re good for you. Grummon explains that misleading terms such as “all natural” can deceive consumers into thinking a product is healthy, without offering any true health benefit.
“It’s not that it says low calories or low fat. It just says all natural,” – Anna Grummon
Consumers are more likely to choose a brand that makes favorable health claims on the label, assuming these products to be healthier choices. Experimental research validates this tendency. When products call out health claims, consumers perceive them to be healthier and are more willing to pay the cost.
“In experiments, if we manipulate whether the product has the claim or not, people like the product more when it does. They think it’s healthier and are more likely to buy it,” – Anna Grummon
The Impact of Marketing Strategies
Food manufacturers have already conquered entire classes of products designed expressly for specific demographics. They use the term “toddler” to market products they’ve developed that they refer to as “toddler milks.” In fact, without any scientific evidence to the contrary, they market these drinks as absolutely necessary for young children.
“They’ve essentially created an entire category of food called toddler milks, and they’re marketing them as if toddlers need specialized drinks,” – Christina Roberto
Yet behind this strategic marketing lies a surprisingly consistent economic logic. This reveals how companies use resources to figure out what makes their products attractive to consumers. By developing marketing and label communications that appeal to the emerging public priorities of health and wellness, manufacturers can have a profound effect on consumer buying patterns.
“They put the resources in to figure out how to make things appealing,” – Christina Roberto
Leave a Reply